The review led to five stars on Content Quality, Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching Tool and Ease of Use for Both Students and Faculty.
There are some concerns, but they denote a lack of documentation on our side more than a deficiency in the application itself: in the next days we'll add some information in the handbook to fix this.
Many thanks to the reviewer!
Update: We wrote a new blog post, Instructions for Instructors, when we explain better what teachers can do and expect from the website.
Post a Comment